Skip to content

What Is A Woman? San Diego County Passes Ordinance To Expand Definition

Note: This article may contain commentary or the author's opinion.

What is a woman? Ketanji Brown Jackson wasn’t able to answer this question posed during her SCOTUS confirmation hearing last month, but she may be able to now if she follows the San Diego County Board of Supervisors and their new expanded definition of “woman.”

By a vote of 3-2, the Board passed then ratified an ordinance to adopt the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), an international treaty adopted in 1979. While this treaty was signed by President Jimmy Carter in 1980, it was never brought to the Senate for ratification. Since then over 180 countris have adopted the CEDAW.

But the Board didn’t stop at the CEDAW. In four parts it added new language to the clauses “Women and girls,” “Gender,” “Gender equity” and “Intersectional” incorporating male-to-female transgender residents of the county into the definition as well as systems of discrimination:

F. “Women and girls” shall mean those who identify as women and girls, including transgender women and gender non-conforming, and those assigned female at birth who include non-binary, transgender men and intersex communities.

G. “Gender” shall mean the characteristics of women, men, girls, and boys that are socially constructed. As a social construct, gender can vary among cultures and can change over time.

H. “Gender equity” shall mean the redress of discriminatory practices and ensuring equitable conditions that enable women and girls to achieve full, substantive equality with men, recognizing that needs of women and men may differ, resulting in fair and equitable outcomes for all. This includes the redress of discriminatory practices and ensuring equitable conditions for persons identifying as transgender, nonbinary, and/or gender non-conforming to achieve full equality and equity.

I. “Intersectional” shall mean the interconnected nature of social categorizations and individual characteristics that overlap as interdependent and compounded systems of discrimination. These categorizations and characteristics include, but are not limited to, gender, gender identity, race, ethnicity, nationality, immigration status, sexual orientation, age, socio-economic status, education, language, and disability.

"*" indicates required fields

After all their wokeness, will you be visiting Disney this year?*
This poll gives you free access to our premium politics newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Because this new expanded definition of “woman” includes transwomen and intersex women, these “women” will be allowed in county facilities such as prisons, homeless shelters, and domestic violence shelters as “women,” according to local television station KUSI-TV. The station even broadcast the April debate and public hearing, which was heated at times, and final vote on the resolution.

Opponents of the ordinance say that while its goal is to protect women it is actually doing the opposite. Erin Friday, an ordinance opponent told the Board at the public hearing that “No amount of hormones or surgery will turn a man into a woman. Permitting male-bodied people to enter into single-sex spaces, take women’s positions on podiums, [and] take their positions in sports teams is the essence of discrimination.” Early, an attorney and a registered Democrat, pointed the finger at both the Democrats and Republicans, emphasing that being a woman is not a belief:

“The erosion of women’s rights by both Republicans and Democrats is beyond the pale.”

Biological men have been booked into women’s jails but are held separately from the women, according to Jonthan Peck, a law enforcement officer, who spoke to the Board at the public hearing. But, with the passage of this ordinance Peck said we will have no way of keeping these people separate from women.